By Takura Zhangazha*
You couldn’t make it up if you tried. It is the stuff of soap opera scripts. An aged patriarch with a relatively young
spouse. A (previously, but that would be
a spoiler) blue eyed ‘boy’/ successor/runner.
And the supposedly intriguing issue of ‘succession’ to head the empire. And
yes, there is a much suffering audience, but as with soap operas, it is
enthralled by the rapid speed at which events occur, empathising with one side
or the other and forgetting its own real circumstances. Of course there are bit part players (the opposition)
that will occasionally get a glance by the audience but it is clear where the
latter’s attention is.
spouse. A (previously, but that would be
a spoiler) blue eyed ‘boy’/ successor/runner.
And the supposedly intriguing issue of ‘succession’ to head the empire. And
yes, there is a much suffering audience, but as with soap operas, it is
enthralled by the rapid speed at which events occur, empathising with one side
or the other and forgetting its own real circumstances. Of course there are bit part players (the opposition)
that will occasionally get a glance by the audience but it is clear where the
latter’s attention is.
For the main actors (the ruling establishment) speed is
key. Hence the rapid nature of the
dismissal of the runner and the ascendency of the wife of the patriarch. As
well as the emergence of new and younger ‘runners’ together with a captured media
for the patriarch and his spouse.
key. Hence the rapid nature of the
dismissal of the runner and the ascendency of the wife of the patriarch. As
well as the emergence of new and younger ‘runners’ together with a captured media
for the patriarch and his spouse.
While the main (political) actors are key in all of this, it
is the audience (the people) that is most important.
is the audience (the people) that is most important.
On the face of it the audience is not only intrigued by the
goings on in the establishment but regrettably it is also entertained. With
each passing (melo)dramatic event as led by the patriarch’s youngish and
ambitious wife, national chatter goes up. What will the former blue-eyed boy do? What will his supporters do? How will the first family defend its
position?
goings on in the establishment but regrettably it is also entertained. With
each passing (melo)dramatic event as led by the patriarch’s youngish and
ambitious wife, national chatter goes up. What will the former blue-eyed boy do? What will his supporters do? How will the first family defend its
position?
These are questions that would be typical of a person
watching something they know they are powerless over when it concerns the
script. Their only control is akin to
the television switch and turning their gaze away from it. And with many soap operas it is the will to
be entertained that keeps viewers gazes firmly set. Even if for 30 minutes at a time.
watching something they know they are powerless over when it concerns the
script. Their only control is akin to
the television switch and turning their gaze away from it. And with many soap operas it is the will to
be entertained that keeps viewers gazes firmly set. Even if for 30 minutes at a time.
This captivation of the people of Zimbabwe by the
factionalism and real division in the ruling establishment points to a paucity of
organic democratic values in our national politics. And the lack of a people-centered
understanding of the meaning and import of a progressive, virtuous
politics.
factionalism and real division in the ruling establishment points to a paucity of
organic democratic values in our national politics. And the lack of a people-centered
understanding of the meaning and import of a progressive, virtuous
politics.
This is because in essence the factionalism in the ruling
party and divisions in the mainstream opposition, as they play out at rallies
and in boardrooms are elitist fights for the spoils of the state.
party and divisions in the mainstream opposition, as they play out at rallies
and in boardrooms are elitist fights for the spoils of the state.
Quite
literally these are mini-struggles for power for its own sake. That is to wield power and utilise it for self-aggrandisement. Either as powerful individuals, cliques or as
politically correct hangers-on.
literally these are mini-struggles for power for its own sake. That is to wield power and utilise it for self-aggrandisement. Either as powerful individuals, cliques or as
politically correct hangers-on.
These manoeuvres to acquire the levers of state power are
therefore devoid of broader national
agenda beyond removal of either the ruling party’s incumbent leader or being
the next in line to lead a struggling opposition. But that is not the real problem, only a
symptom of it.
therefore devoid of broader national
agenda beyond removal of either the ruling party’s incumbent leader or being
the next in line to lead a struggling opposition. But that is not the real problem, only a
symptom of it.
The direct link of political
power and wealth has made for many any ordinary Zimbabwean, politics appear as a privileged exercise
for those that already have money or those that are close to them. That is why across the board (the ruling and opposition
political parties) there are startling similarities such as an all powerful
leader, youngish wives, blue eyed ‘boys’ and ethnocentric assumptions of
entitlement to power. Hence our national
politics has the characteristics of a soap opera.
But these are not ‘the days of our lives’. It is imperative that we begin to seek and
achieve a value driven politics that is people-centered and in the process
transformational if not revolutionary in its democratic end effect.
achieve a value driven politics that is people-centered and in the process
transformational if not revolutionary in its democratic end effect.
In order to do this, we need to challenge two
key inhibiting developments in our national politics. The first is the crass
materialism that has come to determine who gets into political office and
why. This materialism has led to not
only elitist political leaders but also a culture of entitlement merely because
they have the resources to create undemocratic political patronage networks.
The second key issue that requires not only broader
national introspection and counter action is a creeping culture of a deliberate
strategy of pursuing incremental politics. The most emblematic process that
brought this into being was the undemocratic constitution making process of
2013. It ushered in a culture of
accepting what political principals of ruling party and opposition elite
instructed. And with this we began to
accept piecemeal change as though it is fundamental to the extent of losing
sight of the structural problems our country has. We need to revert back to a more thorough
approach in our activism, one that is perhaps more difficult but is people-centred
and that fully understands cause and effect of the national economy, national politics
and broader societal challenges as they occur.
national introspection and counter action is a creeping culture of a deliberate
strategy of pursuing incremental politics. The most emblematic process that
brought this into being was the undemocratic constitution making process of
2013. It ushered in a culture of
accepting what political principals of ruling party and opposition elite
instructed. And with this we began to
accept piecemeal change as though it is fundamental to the extent of losing
sight of the structural problems our country has. We need to revert back to a more thorough
approach in our activism, one that is perhaps more difficult but is people-centred
and that fully understands cause and effect of the national economy, national politics
and broader societal challenges as they occur.
*Takura Zhangazha writes here in his personal capacity
(takura-zhangazha.blogspot.com)
(takura-zhangazha.blogspot.com)
Leave a Reply